Maybe
I'm the asshole here because no one else seemed to be on my
wavelength which inevitably led me to question the validity of my
perception. Indeed, signs on the ground along the edge of the
memorial merely discourage those making loud noise within the columns
(out respect I assume) and prohibits visitors from playing leap frog
along the tops of the blocks. Yes, there are security personnel
overseeing the site but they seem to be most concerned with the
skipping mongoloids, although admittedly they were not nearly as
stringent as I would have thought. To be honest it appeared to be
related more to safety than out of any sense of respect.
While
sipping coffee at a rooftop café overlooking the memorial I asked a
waitress (from England) her opinion on the matter. My view of the
situation never seemed to have occurred to her. Another friend told
me that the 'tombstone' interpretation is merely one of many. And I
have to admit the memorial is in a public square open to all
passers-by 24 hours a day. The blocks are exceedingly plain and had I
not been aware of the site's significance I myself would have
probably unleashed my inner kangaroo on the rows of concrete blocks.
All in all I suppose the area is not conducive to an overwhelming
sense of deference. But still, is this not a F***ING Holocaust
memorial!!!!!!! If this same arrangement were found on the grounds of
Auschwitz or Dachau I seriously doubt children would be playing hide
and go seek while screaming with giddy anticipation in an attempt to
avoid being 'it'. Call me crazy.
I have
not even mentioned the underground museum. Beneath the blocks lies a
museum dedicated to families and individual victims of the Holocaust.
Within the walls you will find general history punctuated with
individual tales of horror. The idea is to personalize what happened.
These weren't just Jews. They were people. They each have a tale to
tell. 'The Room of Families' highlights the havoc wreaked upon entire
families along with their locations and forced migrations throughout
Europe. There is 'The Room of Names' where the name of a victim is
projected on all four walls of a darkened room while the personal
story of the individual is read aloud. There is also a room with
correspondence and journal entries from those experiencing the
nightmare first hand. Often there is a note with the words, 'The fate
of so and so is unknown'. The museum also has a searchable database
for those wishing to trace relatives that may have died in the
genocide. In all there are over three million names in the bank, only
about half of the estimated total that perished (names are still
being added).
As I
sat there trying to reconcile my fairly laid-back nonjudgmental
nature with a growing disdain for humanity as a species a thought
suddenly occurred to me: This may be the most brilliant and poignant
memorial ever conceived and built in the history of mankind. Perhaps,
this is exactly what the artist intended, a real life fluid
representation of the past, present, and future struggle of Jews. A
metaphor if you will. Viewing the scene through this lens made me
feel like I was watching a work of art constantly reshaping itself, a
work in progress, never to be completed. If the purpose of art is to
influence, to stir emotion then this one is an overwhelming success,
at least from my standpoint.
I
suppose the real question is: What would Jews think of all is?
Unfortunately, there were none on hand to ask (at least none I could
discern). I did find signs of reverence in the form of individual
flowers laid upon some of the blocks, as if to underscore the
gravestone allusion. So it seems someone somewhere appreciated the
solemn nature of the site. If I was a betting man I would place my
money on someone of the Jewish persuasion.
UPDATE:
After doing a little research it turns out I am the asshole…..I
guess. Peter
Eisenman, the designer, is quoted as saying, "I want it
to be a part of ordinary, daily life. People who have walked by say
it's very unassuming... I like to think that people will use it for
shortcuts, as an everyday experience, not as a holy place." So
it appears that I am missing the whole point and that I might as well
wipe my ass with my 'theory of brilliance'. Hath I not becometh a bit
oversensitive?
UPDATED
UPDATE: Screw that. I've given this a lot of thought. An 'unassuming
Holocaust memorial' is a contradiction in terms. Personally, I find
the idea preposterous. Either its a memorial to six million dead
people or it is not. As far as I am concerned no happy medium exists.
My first reaction to the behavior I witnessed at the memorial was one
of disgust. I'm going with that. Perhaps, there is an art lesson
here. A work of art, once completed, once unveiled, is no longer the
sole property of its creator. It belongs to anyone who takes the time
to fully appreciate its significance. I do not care what Mr. Eisenman
intended or what he 'meant'. I only know for certain its effect upon
me. I just assume hold a birthday party at Auschwitz then gambol
fecklessly through the grounds of this site. When all is said and
done it just feels wrong to me.
When it comes to situations like these, where one has to explain the importance of respect for the dead to the common layman, I usually mark its importance or clarify it to them by explaining to them how one would feel, if they had to walk a mile in their shoes... the significance amplified when you point it to them that this is a memorial for victims of mass genocide, not for someone's grandfather that has passed away of natural causes. The only way one can truly understand/perceive other's ideas/perspectives these days is if they have also suffered the same.
ReplyDeleteI feel Peter Eisenman has generalized something (the memorial) that is meant to evoke feelings of remembrance, least of all respect for victims of people who have suffered under excruciating conditions, into a "novel" approach for the sake of calling it "art". And we all know how art is meant to be subjective. I disagree with his take, because at the end of the day, I know if I were one of these victims, and if I knew all I was, was a statistic in history books, I'd choose to be remembered by my family and loved ones in private. Any memorial should be lessons learned.. while skipping rope, giggling, having a picnic is all fine and dandy within the premises of a park, homes etc, a memorial defies all definition of such.
I am not sure how this "everday experience" memorial was sold to the public, but I also feel that it is a reflection of the times.. some people just want to forget. Sometimes some people choose to ignore.
My apartment window faces directly onto the Holocaust Memorial.
ReplyDeleteFive years ago we(my German-born wife) and I chose this apartment precisely because of this view, and directly related to our recent visit to Auschwitz.
We chose this apartment to remain in remembrance of the past, but also to be cognizant of the huge (and unfinished!) work many (not all!)brave Germans have undertaken to integrate this evil past into a shining open developing German understanding and identity NOW.
We chose this apartment to inspire us to integrate this trauma of the past into yet greater capacity to humanity right now.
So may I share my own view?
In this context may I say I don't think there will ever be a right view, simply because the dark enormity of the Jewish (and the gay, and the gypsy) Holocaust is humanly beyond our imagination.
But we continue the discussion, as we must.
Sadly due to limited time, my comments must remain shorter than the subject merits.
So ist das Leben. C'est la Vie.
We walk through the Memorial every couple of days with our 4-year old son.
How should we communicate this to this little German with a New Zealand father, whose grandfather fought (second-highest medal of bravery) in the Second World War against the Nazis, or his great grandfather who lost his arm fighting the Germans in World War One?
How should I offer him a German identity that will help my son move forward?
In our own case we feel completely at home letting him play Hide-and-Seek within the Memorial.
Sometimes however we ask him to be quieter since "we don't want to hurt others' ears"
We have not yet told him anything of the Nazi past.
He has no context yet to handle this.
One time he came with his toy gun, as almost all young boys have, and I asked him to put it away and not carry it here.
If he had refused I would have gone away from the Memorial.
I personally feel that the Memorial is an incredible attempt to memorialise this historical event.
I also feel the vital aliveness of the German-language discussion of what is "appropriate" in relation to this special German past.
But it will inevitably always remain an attempt: I refuse to call anything related to the Holocaust a "success".
This would dishonour that which must remain piercingly human and vulnerable and available to us today: the suffering of many millions at the hand of other humans.
Thanks for taking the time to write such a thoughtful comment. I sincerely appreciate it. Even years later I have a hard time reconciling the causal nature of the memorial with the deathly serious nature of what it memorializes. After rereading my post perhaps I was a bit over the top but it reminds me of the effect the experience had on me. I still lean towards my final conclusion but it is certainly worth a debate. Thanks again.
Delete-Rich